Alabama Authority Stack

Personal Property: ACV vs Replacement Cost

Understanding how depreciation affects your contents coverage and which option protects you better

The Bottom Line

Replacement Cost (RC) coverage pays to replace your belongings with new items. Actual Cash Value (ACV) pays depreciated value. RC costs 10-15% more but pays 2-3× more in claims.

Real Claim Example: Stolen TV

Original purchase price (5 years ago):$1,200
Current market value (depreciated):$400
ACV coverage pays:$400
RC coverage pays:$1,200
Difference:$800 more

With RC coverage, you can buy a new equivalent TV. With ACV, you get $400 toward a $1,200 TV—paying $800 out of pocket.

How Depreciation Works for Personal Property

Insurance companies use depreciation schedules to calculate Actual Cash Value. Most items lose 10-20% of value per year. Electronics depreciate fastest (20-30%/year), furniture slower (10-15%/year).

Depreciation Schedule Examples
How much you'd receive under ACV coverage for common items
Laptop (3 years old)Electronics
Original cost:$1,500
Depreciation (30%/year × 3 years):-90%
ACV payout:$150
RC payout:$1,500
Sofa (7 years old)Furniture
Original cost:$2,000
Depreciation (15%/year × 7 years):-105% (min $0)
ACV payout:$0-$200
RC payout:$2,000
Refrigerator (10 years old)Appliances
Original cost:$1,800
Depreciation (10%/year × 10 years):-100%
ACV payout:$0-$100
RC payout:$1,800

The lesson: Older items have little to no ACV. After 5-10 years, you'd get almost nothing for most belongings under ACV coverage.

ACV vs Replacement Cost: Side-by-Side

Actual Cash Value (ACV)

How it works:

Insurance pays current market value after depreciation. Older items worth less = lower payouts.

Pros:

  • Lower premiums (10-15% less than RC)
  • Standard on most policies
  • No replacement requirement

Cons:

  • Payouts often insufficient to replace items
  • Older belongings worth almost nothing
  • You pay out-of-pocket to replace
  • Doesn't account for inflation
Replacement Cost (RC)

How it works:

Insurance pays to buy new equivalent item regardless of age. No depreciation deduction.

Pros:

  • Full replacement value—buy new items
  • Accounts for inflation and price increases
  • 2-3× higher payouts than ACV
  • Better financial protection

Cons:

  • Higher premiums (+10-15%)
  • Must replace item to get full payout
  • Requires receipts for reimbursement

Real Alabama Scenario: House Fire

Total Loss Claim Comparison
How ACV vs RC affects payout for a family losing everything in a fire

Situation: Birmingham family's home damaged by fire. Contents destroyed: furniture, electronics, appliances, clothing, household items. Total original purchase value: $75,000.

With ACV Coverage

Original value:$75,000
Depreciation (avg 50%):-$37,500
Insurance pays:$37,500
Out-of-pocket to replace:$37,500

With RC Coverage

Original value:$75,000
Depreciation:$0 (not applied)
Insurance pays:$75,000
Out-of-pocket to replace:$0

The Math:

RC coverage costs $200-$300 more per year. In this claim, it paid $37,500 more. That's 125-187 years of premium difference recovered in one claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ACV and Replacement Cost for personal property?
How much more does Replacement Cost coverage cost?
Does Replacement Cost cover everything I own?
Do I have to replace items to get Replacement Cost payout?
Is Replacement Cost worth it for renters?

Upgrade to Replacement Cost Coverage

We'll show you the cost difference and help you decide if RC coverage is right for you